Sighting Reports Previous to 1990
The Air Force's only official investigation of UFOs was titled
"Project Bluebook." This project began in 1948 and ended in
1969. (The project was not originally called Bluebook.
In 1948 the project was called "Project Sign" and later became "Project
Grudge" before the name was changed to Bluebook in 1952.)
One of the several cases that Project Bluebook investigated in 1947
was the Kenneth Arnold sighting in which nine flying disks were
sighted near Mt.
Rainier, Washington on June 24, 1947. I found several pages in
the Bluebook archives pertaining to the Arnold sighting.
Officially Bluebook explained Arnold's sightings as "mirages."
However, one major discrepancy was found in the Bluebook archives:
Kenneth Arnold said that the disks were flying southward from Mt.
Rainier to Mt. Adams. The Bluebook archive contained Arnold's written statement. (Stating
that the disks were moving towards the south from Mt. Rainier to Mt. Adams.)
Another page in the Kenneth Arnold report in the Bluebook archives said that
disks were moving westward. This page totally
contradicts the part of the report which states that the disks were
moving southward.
Commentary:
Why would Project Bluebook contain errors to
the point where one really would not know what the report concludes?
Were the disks moving southward? Obviously that would be true
based on Kenneth Arnold's observations. (This is consistent
with the direction that he was flying and his statement that the
disks were moving from Mt. Rainier to Mt. Adams. Mt. Adams is
almost directly south of Mt. Rainier.) Did the investigators
in Bluebook have reason to disagree with Arnold's observation of the
direction of movement? Was the page in the report a "glaring
error?" What are we to conclude from the report? With
these ambiguities can we trust any of the investigations of
Bluebook? This is the not the only case containing
inconsistencies. (More will be discussed in additional reports
on this web site.)
|